Schools answer content request Regents questioned homosexual content in universtiy courses  By Brandon Copple bcopple@kansan.com Kansan staff writer The University of Kansas and one other Board of Regents school reported courses related to homosexuality or bisexuality in response to an anonymous research request from the Kansas Legislature, according to a Regents´ report. The report, forwarded to the Legislature by Regents staff on Friday, names two University of Kansas courses with content directly related to homosexuality or bisexuality. Wichita State University reported five courses. Barb Conant, Regents press secretary, said that as far as the Regents were concerned, the universities had complied with the request. ³Judging from the responses and the fact that they had to turn this around pretty fast, I´d say they looked as closely as they could,² she said. The Regents office forwarded the request to the universities from the Legislative Research Department in the Kansas statehouse. Legislative research refused to identify the legislator who made the request, citing exemptions for legislative research in the Kansas Open Records Act. Fort Hays State University, refused to provide any course names. ³We didn´t feel this was an appropriate request to be making of an institution of higher education,² said Fort Hays State Provost Rodolfo Arevalo. ³A lot of the content in any number of our courses may be controversial to somebody, but it also may be important to the students for whom we provide those courses.² Arevalo said that no law obligated the universities to respond, although state agencies generally felt compelled to respond to the inquiries of legislators, who control the state´s checkbook. Last week, KU Provost David Shulenburger said he believed the University, as a public institution, was obligated to comply. Shulenburger got the two course names by performing a key-word search of course titles and course descriptions in course catalogs and schedules. Kansas State University also ran a key-word search of course titles and descriptions, but it found no courses directly pertaining to sexual orientation. Sue Peterson, K-State assistant to the president, said the K-State faced a similar situation last summer regarding its policy prohibiting discrimination for sexual preference. She said the legislature took issue with the policy because it went beyond the requirements of federal law. ³We told her we made a conscious decision not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, and we´re not going to change that,² Peterson said. ³And that was the end of it.² The University of Kansas has a similar policy, but no other Regents schools include gays in their anti-discrimination policies. Emporia State University reported no courses totally devoted to this topic. Pittsburg State University said it offered no courses with titles that suggest the topic of homosexuality or bisexuality. In the event of a legislative attack on course content, Conant said the Regents would come to the universities´ defense. ³Part of the Regents´ mission is to advocate for the universities and for the faculty and staff that work there,² she said. ³If we believed this information was going to be misused, we would definitely argue for academic freedom.²